SKOCH Summit

The primary role of SKOCH Summit is to act as a bridge between felt needs and policy making. Most conferences act like echo-chambers with all plurality of view being locked out. At SKOCH, we have specialised into negotiating with different view-points and bringing them to a common minimum agenda based on felt needs at the ground. This socio-economic dimension is critical for any development dialogue and we happen to be the oldest and perhaps only platform fulfilling this role. It is important to base decisions on learning from existing and past policies, interventions and their outcomes as received by the citizens. Equally important is prioritising and deciding between essentials and nice to haves. This then creates space for improvement, review or even re-design. Primary research, evaluation by citizens as well as experts and garnering global expertise then become hallmark of every Summit that returns actionable recommendations and feed them into the ongoing process of policy making, planning and development priorities.

Contact Info

A-222, Sushant Lok Phase I
Gurugram, Haryana
info@skoch.in

Follow Us

Dr Deepak Misra at the 100th SKOCH Summit: Navigating New Frontiers in Economic Justice and Legal Frameworks

Dr Deepak Misra

Dr Deepak Misra

Director and Chief Executive, ICRIER

  • India has created several world-class digital public products, such as the COVID vaccination certificate, UPI, and Aadhaar, that outperform comparable systems in advanced economies.
  • Global digitalization indices significantly underestimate India’s digital progress because they rely on outdated metrics designed for the telecom era.
  • The core issue with existing indices is intellectual inertia, not bias—there is limited understanding of how digitalization has evolved in developing countries.
  • Traditional measures ignore scale effects, failing to account for the impact of India’s billion-plus digital users compared to small, high-penetration countries.
  • Digitalization should be assessed beyond connectivity, including how technology is harnessed for growth, service delivery, and job creation.
  • The CHIPS framework (Connect, Harness, Innovate, Protect, Sustain) provides a more accurate and holistic way to measure a country’s digital economy.
  • Using the CHIPS framework, India ranks third globally at the aggregate level and eighth overall when both scale and per-capita digitalization are combined.
  • While India is highly digitalized at scale, the average Indian user still lags behind, highlighting the need for inclusive digital growth.
  • India’s strongest digital capability lies in harnessing technology, but it lags significantly in innovation, especially AI infrastructure.
  • To remain competitive in the AI era, India must invest heavily in AI infrastructure and move from being a technology user to a global technology influencer.

* This content is AI generated. It is suggested to read the full transcript for any furthur clarity.

So, from scaling Mount UPSC, we’ll go to driving the digital highway. I’m going to start my presentation. We’re going to talk about the state of India’s digital economy. I’m hurrying up because I know there are a lot of things to do before lunch starts. Hopefully somebody is going to fix the screen soon.

This is a report that we publish every year in ICRIER. ICRIER is an economic think tank in Delhi called the Indian Council of Research on International Economic Relations. Thanks to Samir G and the SKOCH Foundation for this opportunity and the invitation. We are delighted. This is a report that came out about three weeks ago, so it’s fresh yet.

The report actually starts with a question, and I want to start with a question to all of you. Can you think of a product that is produced in India, which is far superior in quality to what you get anywhere in the world? I’m not talking about natural products, things that are a gift of nature like mangoes and strawberries, but something that we have invented and produced in India.

When I was a student 30 years ago, when I went to the US, if somebody asked me that question, I would have taken a long time to think. But today it’s not very difficult. Let me start with the COVID vaccination certificate. The one on the left is the one you get in India — digital, easy to carry, hard to replicate, very unique. On the right side is the vaccination card you get in the US. My first vaccination was in the US, the second was in India. The US one is handwritten, messy, easy to replicate, and susceptible to fraud.

What you see is not just that India has a superior product, but the process of getting it is also far more superior in India than in the US. There are ample examples — UPI, Aadhaar — many digital products and services in India are far superior to anywhere else in the world.

But interestingly, if you look at global indices that measure digitalization, you don’t see much of that reflected. India is still ranked very low. I’ll start with an example. The International Monetary Fund, in August 2024, came out with a report measuring the Artificial Intelligence Preparedness Index. According to that report, seven of the top ten countries were European — Denmark, Netherlands, Estonia, Finland, Switzerland, Germany, and Sweden.

Then DeepSeek happened, and there was a shock. China was ranked 30, Indonesia 60, Brazil 65, India 71. If you believe these indices, as a European policymaker you’d feel very comfortable. If you’re an Nvidia stock owner, you know whom to sue.

These indices do not reflect global realities. In our 2024 report, the US was number one, China number two, and India followed. But when research comes from a developing-country think tank, not many people pay attention.

The problem is that digitalization in the AI age is being measured using metrics developed during the telecom era. These are outdated. This is not a conspiracy; it’s intellectual inertia. People haven’t invested enough time to understand how digitalization happened in developing countries.

There are three problems with traditional indicators. First, they ignore scale effects. For example, Fiji with one million people and 90% internet penetration ranks higher than India with a billion users at 70%. The scale difference is ignored.

Second, digitalization is measured narrowly as connectivity. In rich countries, connectivity is fixed broadband; in India, it’s mobile broadband, which is undervalued.

Third, they ignore harnessing, innovation, protection, and sustainability. We created a framework called CHIPS — Connect, Harness, Innovate, Protect, and Sustain. There are five pillars, fourteen sub-pillars, and forty-seven indicators.

We created two indices: CHIPS Economy (aggregate, like GDP) and CHIPS User (per capita). Then we combined them into CHIPS Combined.

At the aggregate level, India ranks third globally — after the US and China. This reflects the rise of the Global South. China is second, Brazil tenth, Thailand twelfth, Nigeria eighteenth — often ahead of G7 countries.

At the user level, India ranks 28th because the average Indian is still not fully digitalized. When you combine both, India ranks eighth. That’s the key number. India is the eighth most digitalized country in the world when both breadth and depth are considered.

Only four Asian countries are in the top ten — China, India, Singapore, and Korea. Only three are from continental Europe.

We plotted scale versus intensity and found that global indices only look at intensity. That distorts reality. Our method combines both.

India’s strongest pillar is harnessing. Once connected, Indians use digital tools effectively — e-commerce, e-health, ICT exports. But we lag in innovation, especially AI infrastructure.

India is farthest from the frontier in AI infrastructure. We are 66% away in innovation. Government initiatives like the India AI Mission and recent budget allocations are timely and necessary.

Let me conclude by saying this: while India is doing very well overall, the average Indian is still not fully digitalized. There is a lot of work to be done in policy and investment so that India doesn’t just use technology but influences the third and fourth industrial revolutions.

Thank you very much.

Participants at the Navigating New Frontiers in Economic Justice and Legal Frameworks

Participants at the Navigating New Frontiers in Economic Justice and Legal Frameworks