India’s ambition to achieve developed economy status by 2047 under the Viksit Bharat vision rests on expanding productive capacity, on engineering a structural transition towards innovation-led, knowledge-intensive growth. It is a shift that is fundamentally dependent on the quality, coherence and forward-orientation of its regulatory architecture.
This conference advances the argument that regulatory framework design is a primary macroeconomic variable, not a secondary administrative consideration and that India’s ability to sustain high-quality growth over the coming decades will be determined in significant part by whether its institutions are recalibrated to incentivise discovery, reward complexity and attract long-horizon investment.
Drawing on productivity economics and institutional analysis, the conference will examine the relationship between regulatory design and key economic performance indicators (including total factor productivity (TFP), incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) and the depth of industrial upgrading) to demonstrate that regulatory fragmentation, compliance asymmetries and institutional gaps represent binding constraints on India’s innovation potential.
It will interrogate a critical structural tension at the heart of India’s development moment. Rather than just focusing on deregulation, it is an opportune time for India to advance a capability-centric model of regulatory modernisation, one that builds institutional credibility, reduces uncertainty for R&D-intensive investors and creates the enabling conditions for domestically anchored innovation ecosystems to take root and scale.
Instead of narrowly focusing on deregulation, the conference discusses a capability-centric model of regulatory modernisation. Such a model should build institutional trustworthiness. It should reduce uncertainty for R&D-intensive investors, create legal certainty for citizens and enterprises and establish enabling conditions for domestically anchored innovation ecosystems to grow and scale. The conference will also examine in what way strategic conformity with international regulatory criteria and global best practices can serve as an instrument of economic statecraft.
Arrival, Tea, Meet and Greet
Picture with Mr Sameer Kochhar, Chairman, SKOCH Group
Welcome: Dr Gursharan Dhanjal, Vice-Chairman, SKOCH Group
Summary: Dr Dhanjal welcomed Professor Mahendra Dev, dignitaries, distinguished guests, and participants to the 108th SKOCH Summit Public Policy Forum. He reflected on SKOCH’s long association with Professor Dev since 2008–09 and acknowledged his early vision for India’s journey toward 2047. The speaker distinguished between reforms and the need for a stronger regulatory framework, emphasizing that the quality of regulation will be more important than regulation itself. He highlighted vision, continuity, and perseverance as essential for transformation. He also stressed that India’s future must be built on competition, trust, innovation, and global assimilation. The speaker called for India to move from being a factory of the world to becoming a product nation and knowledge economy. He concluded by underlining the need for disruption in existing structures to achieve a 30 trillion plus Viksit Bharat economy by 2047.*
View Full Transcript
Opening Remarks: Mr Sameer Kochhar, Chairman, SKOCH Group and Mr Rohan Kochhar, Founder, SKOCH Law Offices
Summary: Mr Sameer Kochhar framed Viksit Bharat as an economic arithmetic problem rather than just an aspiration, defining it as India’s journey toward becoming a 30 trillion economy by 2047. He emphasized that achieving this goal will require sustained high growth over more than two decades. While India already has the ambition, he stated that the real question is what kind of economic and regulatory architecture can make this target achievable. He noted that India’s investment rate is already around 30% of GDP, making productivity the key constraint. The speaker explained that the focus must shift from how much India invests to how much output is generated from every rupee invested. He described Viksit Bharat fundamentally as a productivity project and invited Rohan Kocher to present their co-authored paper on the regulatory framework and the changes required.*
View Full Transcript
The speaker presented Viksit Bharat as India’s goal of becoming a US $30 trillion economy by the centenary of independence, arguing that this target depends on productivity rather than only higher spending or investment. He explained that India must ensure capital, labor, and ideas move faster to their most productive use, making regulation central to the growth equation. The speaker highlighted that achieving the target will require 7.8% to 8% real growth, an IICOR below 4, and TFP growth of about 3.1%. He identified logistics costs, power losses, contract delays, low R&D spending, and patent pendency as measurable barriers to productivity. He also used sectors such as semiconductors, agricultural biotechnology, and pharmaceuticals to show how better rules can unlock growth. The speaker proposed five principles for regulatory modernization: appropriability with proportionality, administrative velocity, institutional capacity, incentive alignment, and evaluability. He concluded that India’s road to US $30 trillion runs through productivity, and productivity is ultimately built by rules.*
View Full Transcript
Keynote: Prof S Mahendra Dev, Chairman, Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM)
Summary: The speaker outlined three core goals for India by 2047: becoming a developed nation, ensuring inclusiveness through employment, skills, health and education, and achieving growth through sustainable and climate-resilient practices. He emphasized that India’s legal and regulatory architecture must evolve alongside its ambition to become a 35 trillion economy. He identified investment and exports as two key engines of growth, arguing that India must improve both investment levels and ICOR efficiency. The speaker clarified that Atmanirbhar Bharat and Swadeshi are about competitiveness and quality, not a return to pre-1991 import substitution. He highlighted process reforms as a quieter but transformative route to improve governance, reduce transaction costs, and strengthen ease of doing business and living. He also called for legal reforms, faster contract enforcement, and predictable dispute resolution to build investor confidence. He concluded that India’s future will depend not only on the reforms it undertakes, but on how effectively they are implemented.*
View Full Transcript
Dr Manoj Kumar, Additional Secretary, Legislative Department, Ministry of Law & Justice
Summary: The speaker emphasized that ease of accessing law is the next frontier of regulatory reform for Viksit Bharat. He argued that before compliance, regulation, and accountability can happen, citizens and businesses must first understand what the law requires of them. He described legal uncertainty as an invisible cost that creates friction, delays, higher expenses, and ultimately suppresses innovation and growth. The speaker positioned access to law not merely as a legal reform, but as an economic, competitiveness, productivity, and development reform. He highlighted plain language as a powerful tool for constitutional inclusion, citizen understanding, better compliance, and trust-building. He proposed a future-ready national access to laws architecture built on accessibility, clarity, interoperability, trustworthiness, and intelligence. He concluded that Viksit Bharat will require regulations and laws that are trusted, understood, accessible, and usable by citizens.*
View Full Transcript
Dr Shekhar Aiyar, Director and Chief Executive, ICRIER
Summary: The speaker focused on trade regulation in the context of rising geoeconomic fragmentation, where stalled multilateral negotiations, increasing trade restrictions, and the weakened WTO dispute system are reshaping global commerce. He argued that India’s strategic strength lies in being a well-connected “connector country” with trade links across the geopolitical spectrum. However, he noted that India still does not trade enough compared to peers, making export growth and labor-intensive manufacturing critical for improving productivity and using the demographic dividend. He called for cutting red tape, reducing non-tariff barriers, modernizing customs, and improving coordination between agencies such as customs, GST, and RBI. He supported more bilateral FTAs, especially in labor-intensive sectors, while cautioning that India must not compromise its strategic autonomy with third countries. He also recommended expanding regional trade, considering CPTPP and RCEP, and participating more actively in plurilateral trade arrangements. He concluded that India should keep the rupee liberal, as an artificially overvalued rupee would act like a tax on exports.*
View Full Transcript
Prof Sachin Kumar Sharma, Director General, RIS
Summary: The speaker emphasized that Viksit Bharat is not merely an economic target but a promise to the next generation, where the quality of regulation will play a decisive role. He highlighted that India must choose whether it will remain a follower of international rules or become an active rule shaper known for quality, innovation, and trust. He noted that global uncertainty, rising protectionism, and a weakening globalization framework make regulatory capability and policy space especially important. The speaker stressed that international trade will be crucial for achieving both the US $30 trillion economy goal and the US $2 trillion export target by 2030. He identified non-tariff barriers, standards, compliance costs, and product quality as major challenges for India’s export competitiveness. He argued that India must engage proactively in global rulemaking on sustainability, AI governance, digital governance, and WTO-related issues. He concluded that smart regulation, appropriate guardrails, domestic reforms, and the ability to co-author international trade rules will be essential for achieving Viksit Bharat by 2047.*
View Full Transcript
Reserved
Tea Break
The panel discusses how India can shift from compliance-centric to capability-centric regulation. It covers regulatory sandboxes, adaptive licensing, sector-specific innovation cells, better coordination among regulators, stronger technical talent, data-driven supervision, faster clarifications and more predictable enforcement. The focus is not on whether India should regulate innovation, but on how to build regulatory capacity to do so intelligently, proportionately and confidently.
India cannot afford a regulation culture that is either blindly permissive or reflexively prohibitive. Excessive risk aversion can push innovation offshore, discourage experimentation, slow technology adoption and trap firms in lower value production segments. Equally, weak or poorly designed regulation can cause consumer harm, systemic risks, market distortions and loss of public faith.
Moderated by Prof Subhomoy Bhattacharjee, whose work on regulatory governance brings together economics, law, institutions and public policy, the discussion begins by examining how India can strengthen the analytical competencies of regulators. Next, Mr Pradeep S Mehta’s expertise in Regulatory Impact Assessment helps frame the need for evidence-based rulemaking, cost-benefit analysis, stakeholder consultation, sunset clauses, competition assessment and institutional feedback loops. Dr Raghavender GR then offers the perspective of intellectual property and pharmaceuticals, where innovation depends on a delicate balance among incentives for research, affordability, public health, technology transfer and global competitiveness. Finally, Mr Dilip Chenoy addresses Web3 and Virtual Digital Assets, outlining the regulatory challenge of protecting consumers and financial stability without dismissing an entire technological architecture that may shape future digital infrastructure, tokenisation, payments, contracts and decentralised applications.
Summary:
The session focused on India’s innovation journey and the regulatory frameworks needed to support the next phase of growth. It began by noting that India has moved from limited innovation to a startup ecosystem of over two lakh startups with major private capital commitments. The speakers categorized startups into models that adapt global ideas for India, ventures that improve efficiency, and companies doing genuine innovation in sectors such as space, blockchain, virtual digital assets, medical devices, and drones. A recurring theme was that technology is moving faster than policy, making faster regulatory response essential. The session emphasized that India must shift from being a rule taker to becoming a rule creator and rule giver. Regulatory Impact Assessment was highlighted as an important tool to make compliance more capability-driven and productivity-driven. The government perspective linked India’s improved Global Innovation Index ranking, patent filings, trademark systems, Startup India, and the SIPP scheme to stronger IP and innovation support. Speakers also reflected on missed opportunities in electronics, semiconductors, renewable manufacturing, EV supply chains, cloud infrastructure, and software products due to delayed policy action. The discussion highlighted AI-led innovation in sports, especially cricket, women’s cricket and kabaddi, as emerging areas of large-scale investment and market demand. Public health innovation was discussed through India’s role as the pharmacy of the world, its generic medicines industry, vaccine capacity, TRIPS flexibilities, and compulsory licensing. The session concluded that India must balance innovation, regulation, sovereignty, affordability, and quality while building frameworks that enable rather than constrain future growth.*
Prof Subhomoy Bhattacharjee, Consulting Editor, Business Standard & Professor of Practice, OP Jindal Global University
Dr Raghavender GR, Senior Consultant (IPR), Dept for Promotion of Industry & Internal Trade (DPIIT), Govt. of India
Mr Dilip Chenoy, Chairperson, Bharat Web3 Association
Mr Pradeep S Mehta, Secretary General, CUTS International
Ms Tasmita Sengupta, Senior Research Associate, CUTS International
Vote of Thanks: Mr Atul K Thakur, Senior Secretary, State Development Council & India-Nepal Centre, PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Summary: The speaker delivered the vote of thanks on behalf of PHD CCI and SKOCH, expressing gratitude to all participants despite the shortage of time. He called for appreciation of SKOCH and its continued spirit of engagement with economic reforms. He noted that 2026 marks 25 years of India’s economic reform journey, which began in 1991 under then Finance Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh. The speaker emphasized that the reforms changed India’s history permanently and helped the country arrive economically with a human face. He observed that successive governments since 1991 have continued to uphold the progressive elements of reform. He also acknowledged SKOCH’s institutional role in supporting the finer aspects of India’s economic transformation. He concluded by thanking everyone present and handing the program back to the host.*
View Full Transcript
Awards
Lunch
Awards
* This summary content is AI generated. It is suggested to read the full transcript for any furthur clarity.